home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp0.brunel.ac.uk!usenet
- From: Francesco Fantauzzi <mapgfgf@brunel.ac.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.beta,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.sather
- Subject: Re: What Should An Exception Handling Do?
- Date: 21 Mar 1996 13:53:37 GMT
- Organization: Brunel University
- Message-ID: <4irn11$7ln@mimas.brunel.ac.uk>
- References: <1996Mar14.155641.4299@schbbs.mot.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: maths-pc-125.brunel.ac.uk
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)
-
- shang@corp.mot.com (David L. Shang) wrote:
- >
- > [...]
- >But, most exception handling mechanisms focus on the second case,
- >which makes exception handling very complicated for recovery. (C++
- >even gives up recovery.) [...]
-
- ^^^^^------- This isn't really true (if I have understood what you
- mean). You can read a dissertation about that in "The Design and
- Evolution of C++", by B.S.
-
- Francesco G. Fantauzzi
-
-
-
-